<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Week 2 Reading Response</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vsaucier.wordpress.com/2006/09/13/week-2-reading-response/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vsaucier.wordpress.com/2006/09/13/week-2-reading-response/</link>
	<description>"There are books of which the backs and covers are by far the best parts" ~Charles Dickens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 11:05:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: amanda etches-johnson</title>
		<link>http://vsaucier.wordpress.com/2006/09/13/week-2-reading-response/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>amanda etches-johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 16:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vsaucier.wordpress.com/2006/09/13/week-2-reading-response/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Hi Vicki - yes, I&#039;d consider a &quot;blogger&quot; and a &quot;blog editor&quot; one in the same. I think the term &quot;blog editor&quot; might have fallen out of favour since Blood&#039;s article was published, as the more widely-used term today is definitely &quot;blogger&quot;. Mind you, a &quot;blog editor&quot; might be an important role for multi-author blogs, but I don&#039;t think that was Blood&#039;s intention when she used the term!

And I like your example of using a blog as a collaborative tool at work - they really do work in such instances!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Vicki &#8211; yes, I&#8217;d consider a &#8220;blogger&#8221; and a &#8220;blog editor&#8221; one in the same. I think the term &#8220;blog editor&#8221; might have fallen out of favour since Blood&#8217;s article was published, as the more widely-used term today is definitely &#8220;blogger&#8221;. Mind you, a &#8220;blog editor&#8221; might be an important role for multi-author blogs, but I don&#8217;t think that was Blood&#8217;s intention when she used the term!</p>
<p>And I like your example of using a blog as a collaborative tool at work &#8211; they really do work in such instances!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katharine Thompson</title>
		<link>http://vsaucier.wordpress.com/2006/09/13/week-2-reading-response/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Katharine Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 02:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vsaucier.wordpress.com/2006/09/13/week-2-reading-response/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I also liked Rebecca Blood&#039;s point about self reflection through blogging. I had always thought of blogs as a means for people to disseminate their ideas and reinforce their own views, but I never thought about the effect of keeping a journal which records thoughts that most of the time one just forgets and thereby coming to better know yourself. I hope I don&#039;t find out that I&#039;m a complete moron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also liked Rebecca Blood&#8217;s point about self reflection through blogging. I had always thought of blogs as a means for people to disseminate their ideas and reinforce their own views, but I never thought about the effect of keeping a journal which records thoughts that most of the time one just forgets and thereby coming to better know yourself. I hope I don&#8217;t find out that I&#8217;m a complete moron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
